Our medical review process
By MenoVerdict editorial team
At MenoVerdict, we never fake or imply clinical sign-off where none has taken place. This page explains how our source verification works today, what our honesty notice means on every page, and how clinician review is cryptographically locked to page versions.
1. Source verification before publication
Before any health page is published, every factual claim in the article must be mapped in the page's frontmatter to a specific entry in our verified source registry and cited inline in the text. See how we check the evidence and how we grade evidence for the source hierarchy we use (regulator labels and statements first, followed by medical society position statements, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials).
If a statistic or medical claim cannot be confirmed directly from a source we have opened and checked, we remove the claim and log it rather than guessing.
2. Our honesty rule on medical review
Many health websites display a "Medically reviewed" badge on pages that have not been reviewed by a named clinician, or keep the badge visible after the text has been edited. Our publishing gate forbids both:
- When a page has not yet been reviewed by a named clinician: The page displays a clear notice at the top stating that the article was written by the MenoVerdict editorial team from cited sources, has not been written by a doctor, and has not yet been reviewed by a named clinician. No
reviewedBystructured data is emitted in the page's JSON-LD. - When a verified clinician reviews a page: Their full name, credentials, and review date are recorded in
content/_people/people.yamlalongside a SHA-256 hash (approved_hash) of the exact article text and frontmatter they approved. - Automatic reset on edit: If a single sentence of a clinically reviewed article or tool is later changed, the SHA-256 hash no longer matches and the page automatically reverts to the unreviewed honesty notice until the clinician approves the updated version.
3. Interactive tool logic review
Each interactive tool on our free menopause tools hub is governed by a plain-language specification file (content/_tools/<id>.yaml) that lists every input, calculation, output, safety trigger, and code file implementing the tool. Our editorial policy and commercial disclosure set out how we keep commercial links strictly separate from clinical evidence and tool outputs.
Where are you right now?
Still tracking
Not sure if your symptoms fit? Start tracking your daily patterns.
Log and spot your patterns with the symptom checklist →Ready to talk to a doctor
Have an upcoming appointment? Bring structured questions and your history.
Prepare your 10-minute doctor appointment questions →Already on treatment
Evaluating your response or wondering what to adjust next?
Explore evidence-graded treatment and lifestyle options →Related pages
Change log
- : Published medical review and honesty process page